United Way Teen Pregnancy Prevention: Pregnant boy, 2
Advertising Agency: BVK, Milwauukee, USA
Creative Director: Gary Mueller
Art Directors: Brent Goral, Giho Lee
Copywriters: Mike Holicek, Jeff Ericksen
Photographer: Tim MacPherson
Published: December 2007



Comments
does anyone see this nice?
--
Everartz
| Everartz |
Art direction and old school death metal.
www.everartz.blogspot.com | myspace.com/inkill
Yes, very nice. Gets the message across.
"Assume nothing, question everything."
This idea is older than most people on this forum. 39 years old this year in fact. It was done first and better in 1970. The headline, art direction and message were better in the original. And what was groundbreaking in 1970 is not-so-much today.
For fuck's sake, people working as advertising creatives should know the first thing about advertising. try to get a job at Saatchis with that in your book. The laughter would be deafening.
http://www.saatchi.co.uk/the_pm
I doesn't look nice, it looks weird. It does the communication job it is supposed to.
yes it looks weird, but not in the way it should. beetween the lighting, the facial expresion (he looks twentysh), the shot, the headline across the photo, the "details" of who this boy is, the message comes across noisy and unclean.
Also the writing should be better, the headline its a little confusing.
I like the "get beyond disturbed. get involved." though.
i totally agree with u it isnt nice and the peopl who saying ist nice dont know what their talking about.and it does the communication job it is suppoed to.its stupid.
hun, i don't think you get the message Iit's trying to tell ppl...i will give you a clue......TEEN PREGNANCY, GIRLS, TEEN UNPROTECTED SEX, TEEN PREGNANCY!!!!!
Its a good and true insight.
But, I think the execution is off.
It looks gooffy. Meaning, slapstick comedy so
maybe it doesn't work on the level the creatives mean it to.
I assume they meant it to be more serious.
What a dumb idea!!!
It's not less disturbing when it's a girl. Of course showing a 15-years-old pregnant girl would be first idea but that's
just wrong direction of thinking. Gender has nothing to do with age.
I guess it's a bad concept based on a 'we hope it will be a
very' shocking image.
(There's some potential in it if they would try to convince parents
who have only sons.)
but it IS disturbing! VERY!!!!!!!
HOW DISGUSTING FOR A GUY 2 B THE PREGNANT ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ewww. that is nasty what the!!!!!!!!
this is the so grose
wat da fuk
i guess they are trying to get the point across that teens shouldnt want to get pregnant because its not just the girls problem. the baby has to have a dad and he has to be responsible. the gender doesnt matter, because the baby will need two parents!
ohhhh no
ohh there goes the pbap!!! Pop Belly!
EWWWWWWWWWWWWW
EWWWWWWWWWWWWW
EWWWWWWWWWWWWW
that makes absolutly no sense. it should be more disturbing cuz if u havent noticed dudescant get pregnant
i don't find it disturbing at all, i like this one better then the other 2!!, i understand what they are trying too say!!..thats not groose thats cool!!
Hey its their body so if you got pregnant we could say eww to you
ricky can no mae
it looks weird.
oh wat's that
how he came like this hhehehhehe
i think they do it in wrong way hheheheheh
Shit idk wut to say bout this! I'm pregnant as a teen nd to Me it looks normal buh not with a guy! Omg! This tripped Me out so bad! I seen the pic nd thought of my brother aha buh naa my brother wuldnt go that far aha! So you people saying it grosse or sick think bout ur self cuz never kno carma WILL hit you nd next time it might be you on that pic!
Ummmm....wtf? That is so wrong in many ways lol.
that is how u get the message across
Post new comment