Advertisement

Stories

Agency: 
Published/Aired: 
May 2008
Description: 
Advertising Agency: AMV BBDO, London, UK
Executive Creative Director: Paul Brazier
Art Director: Paul Cohen
Illustrator: Paul Davis
Copywriters: Mark Fairbanks, Tim Riley

Comments (14)

Log in or register to post comments

Highest Rated

Hiperion's picture
Hiperion
Activity Score 3138

horrible art..
it made me sick...

BOOBJOB LOOBCANNON's picture
BOOBJOB LOOBCANNON
Activity Score 1838

Whilst this campaign looks great, it fails to blow my bone after all the great stuff in the past, although that angle had ran its course too.

We're going to need more lube.

Pacific Blue's picture
Pacific Blue
Activity Score 335

Agree with every word that you say.

I think that when we see The Economist we wait for great stuff and smart lines.
That's why is so powerful brand.

sloppy4's picture
sloppy4
Activity Score 1494

you agree it doesn't blow his bone?

Disco Munky's picture
Disco Munky
Activity Score 3890

why?...why're we going there?

"Make a name, or be defamed"

Doin' it for the points

dcgroppo's picture
dcgroppo
Activity Score 239

That line is so obvious... and the visual is crap. I prefer the rubbish one...

Mr. R's picture
Mr. R
Activity Score 80

agree.

andre_j's picture
andre_j
Activity Score 88

the fact that the economist doesn't acknowlege cloud-cookoo land stories is an outrage. no wonder one of their branding colors is red...and look what they want to do to the world.

phoamcor's picture
phoamcor
Activity Score 1284

weak

B2B's picture
B2B
Activity Score 104

Rubbish is best. Not sure about AD though.

whitespace's picture
whitespace
Activity Score 1953

I like the Economist a little less after seeing these ads. Hope the ads aren't telling us where the future articles are going.

Quink's picture
Quink
Activity Score 234

bring back the glory days of Economist ads! Those worked just fine, why change a winning formula?

Disco Munky's picture
Disco Munky
Activity Score 3890

All these ads are saying is that the Economist doesn't make up stories, selects the best stories to report on and that they try to balance each story to show the whole picture.

That's like a Doctor saying that he'll examine you and then prescribe treatment as best he can.

Basically they're saying that they do their job properly, which shouldn't be your selling point should it? You should be doing more to ensure that you are the best.

Or am I living in "cloud-cuckoo land"?

"Make a name, or be defamed"

Doin' it for the points

jamesrothenburg's picture
jamesrothenburg
Activity Score 554

I like the other two, this one is shit. The other ones talk about choosing the best stories and writing balanced articles, this one just says we don't make stories up. So what? Did a focus group write these?

Hiperion's picture
Hiperion
Activity Score 3138

horrible art..
it made me sick...

Advertisement