Saatchi & Saatchi: Dummy text

Saatchi & Saatchi: Dummy text

Saatchi searching for a senior copywriter.

Advertising Agency: Saatchi & Saatchi, Beijing, China
Creative Director: Steven Cheng
Art Director: Jimmy Wang
Copywriter: Jimmy Wang, Donghao
Published: July 2007

Your rating: None Average: 8.9 (9 votes)

Comments

done so many times before... anyways i hope they find one soon

ivan's picture

Good to somebody can comment. :) For those who can't please give us some time. We're fixing up some stuff.

picturejockey's picture
musback's picture

Hadn't seen this outing before, so i give it my thumbs up! Eeey!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
New Blog @ http://musback.blogspot.com

I think the new one that just posted today is better than the one you refer to. At least it makes more sense. They are looking for a copywriter. But the one you referred is for an advertising & marketing headhunters. It covers much wider base. It can be headhunters for media department, account services, research, or for marketing department which doesn't make much sense in these cases.

Anyway, the point is that most ideas have been done before. Try not to write it off because you see similar execution before. You should also see if it's done better or not.

read the last line of copy on the ad. "copywriters needed." it's the exact same idea. one thing i've noticed about this site is you see an abundance of unoriginal ideas coming from china and india. perhaps because they frequent this site more often than they should.

NO IDEAS & NO IDEAS. Bob should keep an eye on his agencies.

If this isn't a '1st box-er' I don't know what is.

"...build it and they shall cum." Seattle Sperm Bank.

I think they also need an Art Director :)

Dalbir
www.AdOfDaMonth.com

Graphic Junkie

Nice!!!!
But the kerning needs work!

heh. it's supposed to be released in ... get this... friggin CHINA!!!!!

i like it

Not too much impressive but nice work.

The same again. Enough Lorem Ipsum!
Byte!

the credits include two copywrighters.. haha..

wouldn't

Loorem Ipsum & Loorem Ipsum

be better? (Saatchi, get it?)
:))

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options