Submitted by Gerry (not verified) on Fri, 2007-08-31 03:46.
The analogy is just wrong. Killing elephants is a wildlife conservation issue. Murdering journalists is a political issue. They are not to be weighed against each other.
On the contrary, I find the message very strong!
Don't you find it unreal and absurd to have a weaker condamnation for killing a person than for killing an animal?
Comments
5 out of 10
Weak campaign. There's no difference between these two ads except the words "animals
illegally" and "an elephant".
mattcrump.com
Agreed. And the copy is kinda clunky on both
The analogy is just wrong. Killing elephants is a wildlife conservation issue. Murdering journalists is a political issue. They are not to be weighed against each other.
On the contrary, I find the message very strong!
Don't you find it unreal and absurd to have a weaker condamnation for killing a person than for killing an animal?
--------------------------------------------
http://lalbumnpo.wordpress.com the very best of non profit campaigns
Is this an ad that ask for right to kill elephant freely in Africa?
Sucky typography aside, the main concept ain't too great either.
-Tung
--good idea is enemy of great idea
I think it is a poster rather than an ad.
~~be cool eh!~~