14 comments

Guest's picture
GuestMonday, February 23, 2009 - 15:15

Her skin looks so weird if you look closely.

justpassingby's picture
1370 pencils
justpassingbyTuesday, February 24, 2009 - 09:52

pervert, look at the ad not her skin

Guest's picture
GuestMonday, June 28, 2010 - 14:09

her skin is the ad

Guest's picture
GuestWednesday, February 25, 2009 - 10:38

weird as in... it looks like skin close up?

Guest's picture
GuestMonday, February 23, 2009 - 16:02

Worked for me... now I need a cigarette :-P

postman's picture
953 pencils
postmanMonday, February 23, 2009 - 16:37

Executed this way it doesn't give any new insight. Visualising the benfit of the product would mean show her taking off these "unwanted panties" somehow. (Maybe that is what the team intented to show here - in that case it is not obvious enough for me.)

everartz's picture
7627 pencils
everartzMonday, February 23, 2009 - 18:48

i second that....
--
Everartz

| Everartz |

Guest's picture
GuestMonday, February 23, 2009 - 18:54

Yeah I agree.. I think it needs a shadow under the white skin part. I think that would work a lot better.

ehd's picture
9 pencils
ehdMonday, February 23, 2009 - 19:01

agree, shadow would definitely make it more clear. It just looks like a normal tanline

Guest's picture
GuestTuesday, February 24, 2009 - 03:00

Idiots.
It works. Leave a tanline... well guess what, she's left a tanline. Oooh, we neeeeed a shadow because my wittle bwain can't understand.

Guest's picture
GuestTuesday, February 24, 2009 - 02:27

fuck an old idea, done for Bose headphones

Guest's picture
GuestTuesday, February 24, 2009 - 02:53

Really? Bose headphones were selling a tanning solution?

Gilsem's picture
80 pencils
GilsemTuesday, February 24, 2009 - 15:50

plus a set of strings :D

Guest's picture
GuestMonday, March 2, 2009 - 10:19

DISGUSTINGGGG, in all ways,