Advertisement

Comments (8)

Log in or register to post comments

Highest Rated

adrianapr's picture
adrianapr
Activity Score 1238

well, i think the illustrations were done this way obviously on purpose... right, bbh?
me myself and irene don't like it very much but i think I understand what they wanted to do here. i'm not so sure of course.

ramosraf's picture
ramosraf
Activity Score 115

this is very bad!

60' s

Spanky's picture
Spanky
Activity Score 4899

i could understand producing this if the client killed everything good, wrote the "headlines" and hired their nephew to do the illustrations. but why the fuck would you even think about submitting it to ads of the world? it almost makes you think someone there thought it was good.

BurnX's picture
BurnX
Activity Score 15

Hey dude, as bad as it looks to U, no need to use expletives! tsk tsk tsk manners!

BurnX's picture
BurnX
Activity Score 15

Hey dude, as bad as it looks to U, no need to use expletives! tsk tsk tsk manners! Spanky! Spanky!

Spanky's picture
Spanky
Activity Score 4899

there are needs and then there are wants. as in i want to ask you, why the fuck are you talking to yourself?

BurnX's picture
BurnX
Activity Score 15

Chill out dude :) U obviously 'needed' and 'wanted' to be spanked...bad boy spanky!

Davosk's picture
Davosk
Activity Score 4815

Looking at these I'm reminded of the bad illustrations featured in the Graphis annuals of the 70s. A lot of good things came from the 1970s, this wasn't one of them.

adrianapr's picture
adrianapr
Activity Score 1238

well, i think the illustrations were done this way obviously on purpose... right, bbh?
me myself and irene don't like it very much but i think I understand what they wanted to do here. i'm not so sure of course.

Advertisement

20% Off Sale at iStock until December 9th 2016