Comments (14)

Log in or register to post comments
Slashh's picture
Activity Score 294

Ugly and unappetizing. Nothing about these make me want to go get a Whopper.

Bianconiglio's picture
Activity Score 406

I agree

sherman's picture
Activity Score 153

nice art work

varatphong's picture
Activity Score 78

When I saw this from a distance I was shocked. I thought someone had stolen some of my compressed teas.


tiborplus's picture
Activity Score 53


addyhoch10's picture
Activity Score 2592

maybe this would work better if it was for the right product...

very generic and replaceable.

creative_assylum's picture
Activity Score 134

i dunno, but i dont hate it

klaussnow's picture
Activity Score 1675

would this be called borrowed interest?

... its already been done...

teenie's picture
Activity Score 1894

Replace the Burger King logo with any other logo and it works exactly the same. I agree with the comment that's it's generic and replaceable. It's a big 'so what'.

Plus the tagline doesn't fit: "irriplaceable since 1957". We're talking about change, so the logical extension of that is "unchanged since 1957" or "exactly the same since 1957." The concept has nothing to do with being irriplaceable.

instinctive traveller's picture
instinctive tra...
Activity Score 189

i do agree teenie. the tag line should have read unchanged since 1957.

Fede Durán's picture
Fede Durán
Activity Score 12

sorry, but sound better in spanish

Fede Durán's picture
Fede Durán
Activity Score 12

Thanks to everybody for the feedback

ptb's picture
Activity Score 20

Why the logo has been placed in different positions?
If you check out this one and the one with the cell phone, the logo placement are completely different.

gpernarella's picture
Activity Score 48

it reminds you that the whopper is a classic!! just that...

after having the thought of that, you desire one!