10 comments

braindrain's picture
242 pencils
braindrainFriday, December 29, 2006 - 03:26

I like the first two a lot, but why show the accident on this one? The anticipation angle is so much better to me.

rainman's picture
267 pencils
rainmanFriday, December 29, 2006 - 03:29

I agree, but I guess it would be hard to show that the plane was moving in print so they went right with the payoff. They could have went with another scenario for a third ad.

squirrely's picture
316 pencils
squirrelyFriday, December 29, 2006 - 07:59

this is brutal.

hemu's picture
18 pencils
hemuFriday, December 29, 2006 - 11:25

It is a fine campg agreed, some sensitive people might spur negetives on the brands,
cause he might think "what the heck".. well may be he changes his mind for the ad cause
the product is awsome and keeps up to its promise.....

yesprabhakar's picture
72 pencils
yesprabhakarFriday, December 29, 2006 - 19:33

Sure...This one doesnt work as good as other two...The antcipation angle is much better.

Prabhakar Soma
www.prabhakarsoma.blogspot.com
www.yesprabhakar.deviantart.com

addyhoch10's picture
2592 pencils
addyhoch10Wednesday, January 3, 2007 - 04:49

wow this one's rude.
this guy doesn't need bose headphones anymore, he needs extra strong alka seltzers.
at least he can't hear himself screaming.

kc_brock's picture
703 pencils
kc_brockWednesday, January 3, 2007 - 12:41

holy crap

luismon's picture
36 pencils
luismonThursday, March 29, 2007 - 00:59

Why do this now?.

Krys's picture
28 pencils
KrysThursday, January 17, 2008 - 01:45

Too negative for the brand.Not working at all

Guest's picture
GuestWednesday, April 15, 2009 - 19:38

Looks like a hijacking gone wrong. The headphone image should be larger unless they are selling airplane wheels.