Advertising Agency: Publicis, Stockholm, Sweden
Art Director: Yasin Lekorchi
Copywriters: Måns Andersson, Johannes Ivarsson
Illustrator: Björn Dahlgren
It's supposed to be cock and cock. The problem is, they are only showing one cock which is the rooster. The other visual is a vibrator/dildo, which is never called a cock. Ever. It's just a substitute for one. Which makes this a bit of a s-t-r-e-c-h for me. (Unless of course the word "cock" sounds like "dildo" in some other language)
agree with slashh. it doesn't really work this way. at least they could have used one of those more natural looking vibrators. or rethink the whole concept. the cock misunderstanding idea could have been used in many other (and probably so much funnier) ways.
I bet the client got gun shy and said to the creatives: we can't show a real cock, make it look less human. That's when the idea became even worse. I wholeheartedly agree that "vibrator" or "dildo" whatever that pinkish thing is, it's not a cock.
Not a very good languag school if they can't get that right.
actually i dont think that ANYONE would show a client an ad with a cock on. So thats why they introduced the dildo. Its the classic ad where the creative is exited about beining edgy and shocking so he forgets basic facts.
I dunno - showing a real cock for part 2 would just be weird. Would it be unattached from the body? That would just be disturbing. I got it right away. Excellent.
Subscribe
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Comments
Apparently today is a penis themed show.
Better than superheros.
Haha, reminds me of embarrassing situations...
http://adpawn.ovh.org
Actually somebody I know name had a problem with pronouncing the word Coke properly and it also came out wrong many times.
that, is a dil -do.
I'm not sure non english speaking people will get it...
www.TheADMad.blogspot.com
i don't think "rooster" and "vibrator" are too similar.
http://www.freerangerobot.com
i don't quite understand,is it "vibrator"?
It's supposed to be cock and cock. The problem is, they are only showing one cock which is the rooster. The other visual is a vibrator/dildo, which is never called a cock. Ever. It's just a substitute for one. Which makes this a bit of a s-t-r-e-c-h for me. (Unless of course the word "cock" sounds like "dildo" in some other language)
I met at least 20 people who call penis cock =)
You misunderstand. I said no one calls a DILDO or a VIBRATOR a "cock."
Yes, I agree a bit of a stretch.
cock stretching? i thought it was a balloon with air.
Oh, I see =) thx
agree with slashh. it doesn't really work this way. at least they could have used one of those more natural looking vibrators. or rethink the whole concept. the cock misunderstanding idea could have been used in many other (and probably so much funnier) ways.
This should be an ad for hearing impared.
You say: Dildo
They hear: Cock/Rooster/Chicken????
Desi
www.DesiCreative.com
I bet the client got gun shy and said to the creatives: we can't show a real cock, make it look less human. That's when the idea became even worse. I wholeheartedly agree that "vibrator" or "dildo" whatever that pinkish thing is, it's not a cock.
Not a very good languag school if they can't get that right.
actually i dont think that ANYONE would show a client an ad with a cock on. So thats why they introduced the dildo. Its the classic ad where the creative is exited about beining edgy and shocking so he forgets basic facts.
The Seinfeld episode where Jerry's deaf lip-reading girlfriend confuses "six" with "sex" is on.
I dunno - showing a real cock for part 2 would just be weird. Would it be unattached from the body? That would just be disturbing. I got it right away. Excellent.
Don't like it.
I think the second image (the pink dildo, or similar) was badly chosen.