Advertisement

Comments (6)

Log in or register to post comments

Highest Rated

G_Patterson's picture
G_Patterson
Activity Score 42

Having an i-pod in an ad that's not for i-pod is a bit misleading.

Decent attempt but lacking focus in art direction.

TopJeff's picture
TopJeff
Activity Score 479

Great concept. Simple, clear, and should appeal to the intellectual crowd that reads the New Yorker.

Jeff

---------------------
TopCreatives, the premier online community for creative pros.

hieveryone4's picture
hieveryone4

Stupid. Using a borrowed interest and an Ipod.

Great concept? No way.

Jordanc's picture
Jordanc

very clever. I like.

Abraham's picture
Abraham

I like the art....great work of illustration...
Not so sure of the concept liked.....but maybe it´s because I´m not a new yorker.

CC3's picture
CC3

What's with the pronuciation thingy? I thought the idea may be you can hear articles from these pubs via podcats, but the pronuciation thing makes it seem like an online dictionary. What did I miss?

G_Patterson's picture
G_Patterson
Activity Score 42

Having an i-pod in an ad that's not for i-pod is a bit misleading.

Decent attempt but lacking focus in art direction.

Advertisement