it seems more appropriate as a political poster than one for webster, the images are too loaded with meaning ::puuuuun!:: to get back to the product simply.
but if websters defines something they must be biased. they are defining what a certain word is/means. thats the point i was trying to make. however, probably not in the best way. thanks though you got me thinking.
Comments
it seems more appropriate as a political poster than one for webster, the images are too loaded with meaning ::puuuuun!:: to get back to the product simply.
could altering the tag help this to not be so political?
is it bad to be political?
Well, when you pit Merriam Webster; which is so absolutely unbiased, and have it take a side, then the hole that you fall down is deep and dark.
but if websters defines something they must be biased. they are defining what a certain word is/means. thats the point i was trying to make. however, probably not in the best way. thanks though you got me thinking.
Post new comment